AI Journalism

When is “News” Not News?

by


Article in the Washington Post by Kathleen Parker, 5/22/26

Headline:  “All this ‘talent’ breaks my brain — and my heart”

Subhead:  “AI fakery is overwhelming. What will happen to human imagination?”

“. . .This brings us to fake news — though not in the way President Donald Trump would have us think. A report from Vulture cites a former executive who estimates that more than 90 percent of what’s online is advertising ‘in disguise.’ At its peak, the content distributor Floodify ran 65,000 dummy social media accounts to gin up interest in its clients, said Joe Lim, who founded the company. This meant that on a given day, Floodify posted 50,000 ads across TikTok, Instagram, YouTube and X, which are all supposedly the output of everyday users. . .”

Read the full article at:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2026/05/22/ai-is-creating-digital-world-fake-talent-fame/

 

Journalism in a Hall of Mirrors

by

Article in The Guardian by Katherine Viner, 5/6/26

Headline: “How to survive the information crisis: ‘We once talked about fake news – now reality itself feels fake’ “

Subhead:  “In this age of crisis, technology is pulling us apart. At its best, journalism can bring us together again, writes Guardian editor-in-chief Katharine Viner”

“. . .As tech companies have prioritised capturing attention, truth has been downgraded. AI slop and deepfakes are now so rampant that it feels that your brain can no longer compute what it’s seeing. You start to question things that turn out to be true. It doesn’t help that reality itself has become so much stranger and more grotesque. . .”

“. . .Before I talk about Guardian journalism, I’m going to talk about what makes that journalism possible. Now, I’ll admit that the words ‘ownership model’ might not set the pulse racing. But it really matters. At the Guardian, we have no proprietor demanding political or commercial returns. We have no profit-driven shareholders demanding cuts or cash. The purpose of the Scott Trust, which owns the Guardian, is to keep the Guardian going in perpetuity, serving the public interest, not the interests of the wealthy. . .”

Read the full article at:

https://www.theguardian.com/media/ng-interactive/2026/may/06/how-to-survive-the-information-crisis-we-once-talked-about-fake-news-now-reality-itself-feels-fake

Journalists vs. AI

by


Article in Columbia Journalism Review by Riddhi Setty

Headline:  “Fighting the Machine”

Subhead:  “Journalists across the United States are fighting for contracts that address AI use: ‘We don’t want it to be done in our name, literally.’ “

“On a chilly day in early April, outside the ProPublica offices in Lower Manhattan, dozens of union members staged a daylong strike—the first of its kind authorized at a major news organization to address, among other concerns, how AI would be used with its work. . .”

” ‘Now is the time to fight this fight,’ Hilke Schellmann, an AI expert and journalism professor at New York University, told me. ‘Because once it becomes standard in a union bargaining agreement across the journalism industry that journalists or employees have no say over AI tools, that quickly becomes a standard.’ ”

Read the full article at:

https://www.cjr.org/analysis/fighting-the-machine-contracts-artificial-intelligence-ai-use-bylines.php

Media Company on the Skids?

by


Article in Daily Kos by Staff, 4/29/26

Headline:  “Trump Media joins the president’s long list of failures”

“Last week, Devin Nunes was fired from his role as CEO of Trump Media. The former congressman and dairy farmer lasted nearly three years at President Donald Trump’s media company, which is honestly impressive given how catastrophically it has performed.

“Under Nunes, the company’s stock collapsed 84% from its 2024 debut, falling from $58 to under $10. . .”

Reads the full article at:

https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2026/4/29/800030163/media-and-culture/trump-media-presidents-failures/

Thinking About AI Media

by

Article in Poynter by Alex Mahadevan, 4/24/26

Headline:  “Opinion | Why can’t newsroom leaders just be normal about AI?”

Subhead:  “A series of tumultuous generative artificial intelligence rollouts make clear that leaders need to listen before leaping”

“I’m more optimistic about generative artificial intelligence in journalism than most of my peers. So it pains me to see AI rollouts that are short-sighted — or even offensive — threaten the fragile truce between reporters and the technology. . .”

“Simply creating more content for the hell of it is like putting a new steering wheel on a Geo Metro. If your AI experiment doesn’t start with a clear problem that your audience or your newsroom actually has, no amount of technology will save it. . .”

Read the full article at:

https://www.poynter.org/commentary/2026/why-cant-newsroom-leaders-just-be-normal-about-ai/

Who Benefits from Erasing History?

by


Article in Gadget Review by A1 Landes, 4/13/26

Headline:  “23 Major News Sites Have Blocked the Wayback Machine – Digital History In Danger”

Subhead:  “Major news organizations including New York Times and USA Today block Wayback Machine amid AI training concerns”

“Major news outlets block Wayback Machine, preventing public access to archived content

“Twenty-three sites including New York Times cite AI training fears as justification

“Journalists lose critical fact-checking tool that exposed editorial changes and accountability issues . .”

Read the full article at:

https://www.gadgetreview.com/23-major-news-sites-have-blocked-the-wayback-machine-digital-history-in-danger

Reporter Bots Know Best?

by

Article in Daily Kos by Walter Einenkel, 4/16/26

Headline: “Fox News is asking AI chatbots to defend Trump’s Iran war”

“Facing a tough reelection campaign, Republican Rep. Mike Lawler went on Fox Business to join host Maria Bartiromo in a President Donald Trump ass-kissing session, where the two defended the Iran war by posing a convoluted question to a chatbot.

“ ‘How would the media report on World War II?’ Bartiromo said. ‘Here’s what I got from Chat GPT. You ready?’ “Leaders like Franklin D. Roosevelt would face nonstop scrutiny—not near unified messaging like in the 1940s. Social media would amplify dissent, leaks, and battlefield setbacks in real time, changing public support even faster.” ‘. . .”

Read the full article at:

https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2026/4/16/800021315/videos/fox-news-is-asking-ai-chatbots-to-defend-trumps-iran-war/

Fabricated Media are Here!

by

Article in Columbia Journalism Review by Emily Bell  3/26/26

Headline: “Did I Really Say That?”

Subhead:  “A European journalist apologized for using AI to fabricate quotes—including from me. But there’s little accountability in blaming a chatbot.”

“Three weeks ago, a Dutch freelancer named Menno van den Bos contacted CJR and the Tow Center for Digital Journalism to tell us he had found a writeup of our Journalism 2050 issue in his country’s press that he suspected of containing AI-generated inaccuracies. In itself this is not surprising. As we have written here before, the incidence of fake quotes and citations from journalists and academics is a growing menace. . .”

Read the full article at:

https://www.cjr.org/tow_center/did-i-really-say-that-dutch-journalist-ai-fabricate-quotes-vandermeersch-mediahuis.php

Join or Fight AI?

by

Article in Columbia Journalism Review by Stephen J. Adler, 3/13/26

Headline:  “How Journalists Can Make AI Work for Them”

Subhead:  “A framework for newsrooms to use AI in ways that don’t sacrifice quality or lessen oversight.”

“Ask a working journalist about AI, and you’re likely to hear a string of expletives, an indictment of tech companies, and—especially if the person is over fifty—a searing lament for times past.

“The use of AI in journalism has recently created controversy everywhere from the Cleveland Plain Dealer to the Associated Press, as many reporters have passionately disagreed with managers who have insisted on its value in reporting and drafting stories. . .”

Read the full article at:

https://www.cjr.org/analysis/how-journalists-can-make-ai-work-for-them.php

Gambling With the News

by

 

Article i in Columbia Journalism Review by Ivan L. Nagy, 3/11/26

Headline:  “Are Prediction Markets Actually Good for Journalism?”

Subhead:  “Dustin Gouker, the author of a Substack about prediction markets, says the media could benefit from keeping an eye on Kalshi and Polymarket.”

“By the time the US attacked Iran, on February 28, half a billion dollars had been wagered on Polymarket, one of the world’s top prediction markets, predicting when the strikes would happen. . .”

“Not long after the war started, Polymarket added a note to its Middle East markets. ‘The promise of prediction markets is to harness the wisdom of the crowd to create accurate, unbiased forecasts for the most important events to society,’ the company wrote. . . .”

Read the full article at:

https://www.cjr.org/the-interview/are-prediction-markets-actually-good-for-journalism-kalshi-polymarket-dow-jones-cnn.php