Boxing With the Press – Not a TKO

by


Article in The New Republic by Staff, 2/26/25

Headline:  “Trump vs. the Media: He Won Round One, but He’s Going to Lose Bigly”

Subhead:  “A judge kinda-sorta found for the White House against the Associated Press. But Trumpworld is pushing things way too far.”

“The White House has been wrongly emboldened by Monday’s District Court decision denying a request by the Associated Press to immediately restore its full access to the White House press pool. The White House pulled AP’s access because the news organization continues to employ the term ‘Gulf of Mexico’ rather than Trump’s preferred ‘Gulf of America.’

In the wake of the decision, press secretary Karoline Leavitt announced a general policy of the White House determining which news outlets can staff the pool. The change breaks with a practice of over 100 years in which the White House Correspondents’ Association determined the press pool membership. New York Times White House correspondent Peter Baker, one of the most eminent reporters in the country, wrote on social media, ‘Having served as a Moscow correspondent in the early days of Putin’s reign, this reminds me of how the Kremlin took over its own press pool and made sure that only compliant journalists were given access.’

“. . .The adjudication of the press pool exclusions will be a major test of the courts and not just district judges like Judge McFadden but the Courts of Appeals, where the issue will be decided. And if those courts, including the Supreme Court, fail to come through and issue lawless rulings upholding Trump’s tyrannical moves, our best hopes were already misplaced.

https://newrepublic.com/article/192015/trump-won-associated-press-media-lose

Drowning in the Press Pool

by


Article in The New York Times by Peter Baker, 2/26/25

Headline:  “In Trump’s Washington, a Moscow-Like Chill Takes Hold”

Subhead:  “A new administration’s efforts to pressure the news media, punish political opponents and tame the nation’s tycoons evoke the early days of President Vladimir V. Putin’s reign in Russia.”

“She asked too many questions that the president didn’t like. She reported too much about criticism of his administration. And so, before long, Yelena Tregubova was pushed out of the Kremlin press pool that covered President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia.

“In the scheme of things, it was a small moment, all but forgotten nearly 25 years later. But it was also a telling one. Mr. Putin did not care for challenges. The rest of the press pool got the message and eventually became what the Kremlin wanted it to be: a collection of compliant reporters who knew to toe the line or else they would pay a price.

“The decision by President Trump’s team to handpick which news organizations can participate in the White House press pool that questions him in the Oval Office or travels with him on Air Force One is a step in a direction that no modern American president of either party has ever taken. The White House said it was a privilege, not a right, to have such access, and that it wanted to open space for “new media” outlets, including those that just so happen to support Mr. Trump.”

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/02/26/us/politics/trump-putin-russia.html#

– – – – –

Article in the Columbia Journalism Review by Paul Farhi, 2/26/25

Headline:  “Will Others Dive into the White House Press Pool?”

Subhead:  “Given the expense of traveling with the president, Trump’s efforts to replace mainstream outlets with far-right media may fail.”

“From its semiformal beginning, in the late 1930s, the White House press pool solved a basic problem of physics: How could a lot of reporters have access to the president’s words and images when only a few of them could fit into the room he was occupying? . . .”

“For decades, pool members have been chosen by an independent organization, the White House Correspondents’ Association. Drawing from a list of volunteers, the WHCA organizes the print, audio, and TV pools that tail the president when he travels or speaks inside the White House. The White House hasn’t had a direct role, other than distributing the print pool’s periodic reports to thousands of recipients from a central email account. This noninvolvement was by design; it left reporters free to make their own decisions about who was qualified to report.

“The Trump White House now wants to blow all that up. . . ”

https://www.cjr.org/political_press/white-house-press-pool-far-right-friendly-media-expense-travel-president.php

WSJ Sued for Tariffs?

by


Article in The Guardian by Staff, 2/26/25

Headline:  “Trump threatens to sue media after Wall Street Journal editorial criticizes tariffs”

Subhead:  “Journal argued Trump’s tariff plans would harm ‘US auto workers and Republican prospects in Michigan’ “

“Wall Street Journal editorial slamming Donald Trump’s tariff plans as terrible for the US economy and auto industry prompted a broadside from the president on Wednesday followed by threats to sue the media.

“In an opinion piece titled Trump’s Tariffs Will Punish Michigan, the Journal argued Trump’s tariff plans would harm ‘US auto workers and Republican prospects in Michigan’.”

https://www.theguardian.com/media/2025/feb/26/trump-wall-street-journal-tariffs

Adrift on the Ocean

by


Article in Columbia Journalism Review by Steven Mufson, 2/25/25

Headline:  “The Real Story of the Washington Post’s Editorial Independence”

Subhead:  “When the Kamala Harris endorsement was spiked, the publisher cited tradition. A closer reading of history tells a different story.”

“Not far from the last desk I occupied after thirty-five years at the Washington Post was the wall that lists all of the paper’s Pulitzer Prizes, trophies of its journalistic success. Tour guides would walk visitors up there and note with reverence the stars—the Woodwards and Bernsteins—as well as dozens of other staffers recognized for international affairs, investigative digging, criticism, the attack on the US Capitol, and more. . .”

“ ‘We all of us know, finally and fundamentally, that freedom of speech, freedom of education, freedom of the press, are the essential guarantees of that liberty without which a nation is only a hollow shell,” Morley said in accepting his Pulitzer, “regardless of the size of its army, the extent of its territory, or the millions of poor sheeplike helots which it may harbor.’

“Ninety years later, Morley and Meyer would be dismayed to see what has happened to the newspaper they did so much to reshape. Competitors—the New York Times, The Atlantic, CNN, and the Wall Street Journal—are poaching many of the Post’s most talented reporters, and large portions of its readership have dropped their subscriptions. . .”

But what’s needed isn’t a new platitude or slogan (Bezos gave the Post “Democracy Dies in Darkness”) or unrealistic financial goals. What’s needed is a simple declaration like the one Meyer and Morley placed atop the editorial page: ‘The Washington Post: An Independent Newspaper. . .’ ”

https://www.cjr.org/business_of_news/the-real-story-of-the-washington-posts-editorial-independence.php

Get Those Reporters Out of the Pool!

by


Article in The New York Times by Michael M. Grynbaym, 2/25/25

Headline:  “White House Moves to Pick the Pool Reporters Who Cover Trump”

Subhead:  “In announcing plans to handpick the reporters who can ask the president questions, the White House is breaking decades of precedent.”

“The White House press secretary, Karoline Leavitt, said on Tuesday that the Trump administration would start handpicking which media outlets were allowed to participate in the presidential pool, the small, rotating group of journalists who relay the president’s day-to-day activities to the public.

The change announced by Ms. Leavitt breaks decades of precedent. The White House Correspondents’ Association, a group representing journalists who cover the administration, has long determined on its own which reporters would participate in the daily pool.

“Because presidents often hold events in smaller settings like the Oval Office, where not every reporter who covers the president can fit, the pool format has long been used to ensure that journalists accurately record a president’s comments. The reporters who witness the events distribute a series of ‘pool reports’ to a wider group of journalists, including hundreds of news outlets that cover his daily activities and remarks.

  • The pool is most often made up of journalists from organizations like CNN, Reuters, The Associated Press, ABC News, Fox News and The New York Times.

Ms. Leavitt said that the new policy was intended to allow “new media” outlets — such as digital sites, streaming services and podcasts — “to share in this awesome responsibility.”

The White House Correspondents’ Association rebuked the move in a blistering statement.

“This move tears at the independence of a free press in the United States,” Eugene Daniels, the president of the association, wrote. “It suggests the government will choose the journalists who cover the president. In a free country, leaders must not be able to choose their own press corps. . . .”

https://thehill.com/homenews/media/5163291-white-house-press-pool-ap/

Media Missing Numbers?

by

 

Article in Common Dreams by Ralph Nader, 2/24/25

Headline:  “An Indifferent Media Is Failing to Report the 400,000 Dead in Gaza”

Subhead:  “Only the Palestinians, who are not allowed to live, don’t get the respect of having their deaths accurately estimated”

“Enough already of the media’s lazy indifference to the vast undercount of the Palestinian death toll from Netanyahu’s genocidal daily bombing and shelling of Gaza’s defenseless civilian population. I’m referring to all the media – the corporate media, the public media, and the independent media. They all stick with the Hamas Ministry of Health’s (MOH) count of named victims whose corpses have been identified by hospitals and mortuaries. For months there have been no operating hospitals and mortuaries to send their grisly data to the Health Ministry.

“The official Hamas count that all sides like to cite is now over 48,000 deaths. As American doctors back from Gaza before the Rafah closing last year said—just about everybody surviving in Gaza is sick, injured, or dying. They put the death estimate almost a year ago at a minimum of 95,000, not counting tens of thousands of families buried under the rubble when Israeli F-16s blew up entire apartment buildings. . . ”

https://www.commondreams.org/opinion/real-death-toll-gaza

Online Media Un-American?

by

Article in yahoo!news by Emily Birnbaum, 2/20/25

Headline:  ” ‘Big Tech Censorship’ of Users Targeted by Trump’s FTC Chief”

“The new leader of the US Federal Trade Commission is opening an inquiry into whether a wide range of online services from social media giants such as Meta Platforms Inc. to ride-sharing companies such as Uber Technologies Inc. ‘censor’ users.

“FTC Chair Andrew Ferguson said the agency is looking for the public to comment on ‘Big Tech censorship,’ which he described as ‘un-American’ and ‘potentially illegal'”

https://www.yahoo.com/news/big-tech-censorship-users-targeted-183130487.html?guccounter=1

Media Music to His Ears

by


Article in Media Matters by Staff, 2/20/25

Headline:  “Right-wing media are divided after Trump pushed Russian propaganda to attack Ukraine”

“On February 18, President Donald Trump pushed multiple false claims about the war in Ukraine and President Volodymyr Zelensky’s involvement in it, falsely suggesting that Ukraine started the war and that Zelensky is a “dictator without elections.” Both claims echo Russian propaganda about the war.

“Many right-wing media figures praised Trump’s comments, with some commentators even following in his footsteps to target Zelensky. Others denounced Trump’s remarks as ‘music to the ears of Vladimir Putin.’ ”

https://www.mediamatters.org/russias-invasion-ukraine/right-wing-media-are-divided-after-trump-pushed-russian-propaganda-attack

Send the Smelling Salts to the Post!

by


Article in Columbia Journalism Review by Yona TR Golding, 2/24/25

Headline: “Spiking and Swooning at the Washington Post“

Subhead:  “What the paper’s killing of endorsements, ads, and cartoons has inadvertently revealed about our fragile Fourth Estate.”

“Earlier this month, Common Cause, a DC-based watchdog, submitted a proof copy of a “wraparound” advertisement meant to run on a Tuesday on the front and back pages of the Washington Post. The ad, later published on the organization’s X account, featured an image of Elon Musk against a red backdrop, eyes closed and grinning in apparent mirth, with an image of the White House aslant in the foreground. The main text of the ad read, ‘Who’s running this country: Donald Trump or Elon Musk?’ Below, in a smaller font, it continued: ‘Since day one, Elon Musk has created chaos and confusion and put our livelihoods at risk. And he is accountable to no one but himself.’ The ad ended with a tagline, ‘No One Elected Elon Musk,’ and a link: FireMusk.org.

“Common Cause, along with the Southern Poverty Law Center Action Fund, which collaborated on the campaign, had a vision: that staffers in the White House, Pentagon, and congressional offices would receive a striking message along with their morning copy of the Post. Together with a full-page ad scheduled to run inside the paper on the same day, the wraparound was set to cost the organizations $115,000.

“It wasn’t to be. Three days after it submitted the proof, Common Cause received notice that the main ad would not be allowed to run, though a sales representative had previously indicated that the copy should not present a problem. In the end, though, ‘they said, ‘You can have something inside the paper but you can’t do the wrap,’ Virginia Kase Solomón, president of Common Cause, told The Hill. ‘We said ‘Thanks, no thanks,’ . . .”

“The Post has so far declined to clarify why the Common Cause ad wasn’t allowed to run, leading to widespread speculation that the decision may have had something to do with the will of Jeff Bezos, the billionaire owner of both Amazon and the Post, and his desire to make nice with Trump’s new administration. ‘Is Jeff Bezos more worried about an angry phone call from the White House than his paper’s journalistic duty?’  Common Cause asked . . . ”

https://www.cjr.org/the_media_today/spiking-swooning-washington-post-wapo-bezos-endorsement-ad-cartoon-kill.php

– – – – –

Article in Common Cause by Staff, 2/24/25

Headline: “NEW: The Washington Post Censored Our #FireMusk Ad”

Subhead:  “The Washington Post – which has a responsibility to hold a magnifying glass up to powerful people like Elon Musk and Donald Trump – refused to run our ad calling them out.​”

https://www.commoncause.org/

Burning the Broadcasters

by


Article in The Guardian by Adam Gabbattm 2/24/25

Headline: ” ‘A true free-speech emergency’: alarm over Trump’s ‘chilling’ attacks on media”

Subhead:  “Warning comes as FCC, chaired by Trump ally and Project 2025 author, orders investigations into US media groups”

“The Trump administration is waging a “disturbing” attack on the freedom of the press that amounts to a “true free-speech emergency”, media experts have warned, as the Federal Communications Commission recently launched an investigation into a series of media organizations, including the owner of NBC News.

The FCC, led by Donald Trump appointee and Project 2025 author Brendan Carr, has ordered investigations into NPR and PBS in the first month since Trump took office, while also scrutinizing a CBS News interview and a San Francisco radio station.

In a letter to Comcast, which owns NBC News, Carr said he had asked the FCC’s enforcement bureau to “open an investigation” into the corporation, stating: “I am concerned that Comcast and NBCUniversal may be promoting invidious forms of DEI in a manner that does not comply with FCC regulations.”

It came after Carr, who was appointed as FCC chair by Trump, said he did not “see a reason why Congress should continue sending taxpayer dollars” to PBS and NPR, publicly funded organizations Trump has threatened to defund.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/feb/24/trump-free-speech-media-attack