data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/980a0/980a02d490e04f7dafa4a97ad2614dd69279cf0a" alt=""
Article in AP by David Bauder, 1/17/25
Headline: “Florida jury says CNN defamed Navy veteran in story about endangered Afghans”
Subhead: “A Florida jury on Friday found that CNN defamed a U.S. Navy veteran in a 2021 story about people paid to rescue endangered Afghans following the Taliban takeover of that country.”
It was an unusual ruling against a media outlet in a defamation case. Libel laws are generally protective of news organizations, and plaintiffs must meet a high standard to prove defamation.
The jury in Panama City, Florida, deliberated for more than eight hours starting Thursday before ruling in favor of Zachary Young, who blamed CNN for destroying his business by showing his face onscreen in a story about a “black market” of smuggling out desperate Afghans for high fees.
The jury awarded Young $5 million in damages and is now being asked to determine whether CNN must pay additional punitive damages.
https://apnews.com/article/cnn-guilty-defamation-afghans-137bf5dbc2d72762d29c9f7596f63ec2
——-
Article in The Hill by Dominick Mastranagelo, 1/17/25
Headline: “Jury finds CNN defamed Navy veteran with segment on Afghan refugees”
“A jury in Florida on Friday found that CNN defamed a Navy veteran with a report on his business that aired in 2021 and awarded him $5 million damages.”
“. . .The jury is also set to decide Friday afternoon on putative damages CNN must pay Young.”
https://thehill.com/homenews/media/5092006-cnn-defamation-lawsuit-zachary-young-navy-veteran/